Em Segunda-feira 19 Janeiro 2009, às 13:09:02, Johannes Sixt escreveu: > Thiago Macieira schrieb: > > Like I said, it's a social problem. > > > > That's the way we've worked for 12 years and we see no reason to change > > just because we're changing SCM. > > > > Now, if we decide that it is a good thing to do, it might be a good > > opportunity to do it while we change SCMs. But that's changing for a > > whole different reason. > > What other reason would there be? > > We had the exact same discussion already in the past: > http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/2007-November/000118.html > > Did something change since then? ;)
No, nothing changed. See my reply to that message: "I simply do not see a way of KDE having restricted repositories, at least not if we want to have a smooth transition any time soon. The social trust network model will not work in KDE since we've been for 10 years allowing anyone to commit anywhere." -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Senior Software Engineer - Nokia, Qt Software Qt Software is hiring - ask me PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
