On February 18, 2010 02:22:44 Thomas Zander wrote: > On Wednesday 17. February 2010 20.09.48 Michael Jansen wrote: > > Moving to git is not only a technical problem. It's a communication > > problem > > > > too. And the last part is probally much more important. At least imho. > > If the move should go smoothly it has to be brought to all affected, > > they won't come and inform themselve. > > We have nothing to say to the wider KDE audience. Most people have a hint > of this git move and thats good. But without actually having proper > rulesets in place (a multi man-month job) we have no date, no details etc. > Communicating or even opening up to a vote on kde-svn ML that we should > move to git without these details (like even a vague impression of *when*) > is political suicide. > > Your points are all very true and you can be sure you are not the only one > with this worry. Its a good worry and it will keep us in line to make this > go smooth. > But at this time its premature.
yes but can we please *please* get documentation of the whole package- splitting thing on techbase so that we can point people there insted of having htis discussion again in three months? I put a table of modules on the svn2git part of the movetogit page, hopefully that'll at least make it clearer how much work needs to be done... I discovered I'm acyually unsure about several modules I'd never heard of so I'd appreciate it if people could check the list and clarify stuff they have definite knowledge about. also, I was too tired to fill in all the bazillions of extragear apps that'll all get their own repos. -- This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3. www.chani3.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
