On Sunday 28 March 2010, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Sunday 28 March 2010 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > $ git clone git://gitorious.org/svn2git/kde-ruleset.git
> > $ grep 'create repository' kde-ruleset/*
> > 
> > Each of those lines will be its own project with one or more
> > repositories.
> 
> Attached is the slighthly edited output of this commands. In this
> form it doesn't really make sense. This would be an insane number of
> projects, especially for extragear I doubt that every single
> application needs its own project.
> 
> If we take the directory as project and the name as repo it makes
> more sense, but there are still quite some inconsistencies:
> 
> * Kate and KDevelop have plugins as top-level project names. I guess
> they should be repos in the respective main projects.
> * Extragear would be a huge project. This might make sense, but maybe
> it also would be desirable to group them by topic.
> * The current main SVN modules which represent what we officially
> release would be in the KDE project, each module one repo. This
> sounds good, but the all uppercase spelling of "KDE" is inconsistent
> with the spelling of the other projects.

For obvious reasons this shouldn't be "KDE", but "KDE SC". Let's call 
the beast by its name and not by the name of the corresponding 
community.


Regards,
Ingo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest

Reply via email to