On 05/12/2010 02:10 AM, Thomas Zander wrote: > The point of Jeff to use git only has merit as indeed git is capable of doing > exactly this. Using two repos to merge in someone elses patches into the > mainline.
My point wasn't that we should use git only. I was just trying to figure out what you meant, because I didn't understand the phrase "pure git based merge requests". > If github only does cherry-picking thats kind of a showstopper for me too, to > be honest. GitHub lets you use the same workflow as Gitorious for merging if you want. It just has a "feature" that lets you merge code without you having to do it yourself, doing it under the hood for you with a click. If you choose to go that route, it cherry-picks. --Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
