https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338186
--- Comment #54 from Marcel Naziri <zwo...@fsfe.org> --- (In reply to Christian Mollekopf from comment #53) > (In reply to Marcel Naziri from comment #51) > > (In reply to Carsten Pfeiffer from comment #50) > What's currently missing from my patch is that we are not using the > optimization that avoid downloading all messages on every sync. This is > because we usually rely on a combination of message-count and uidnext to > detect if new messages are available or old ones have been deleted. Whitout > uidnext we could still avoid a sync if the messagecount remains the same, > but then we would run into the problem that we for instance would never > notice if i.e. one message has been removed and another one added (which is > nasty because it's very unpredictable). Is the nextuid always monotonic increasing value or is it also lowered by the mail server in some circumstances? I will test your patch tongiht or tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs