https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338186
--- Comment #55 from Carsten Pfeiffer <pfeif...@kde.org> --- (In reply to Christian Mollekopf from comment #53) > Whitout > uidnext we could still avoid a sync if the messagecount remains the same, > but then we would run into the problem that we for instance would never > notice if i.e. one message has been removed and another one added (which is > nasty because it's very unpredictable). Marcel said that Courier would report a proper uidnext value when issuing the STATUS command. Wouldn't it be a good workaround to issue the STATUS command in case UIDNEXT is otherwise not available? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
