Thank you very much for that. I will implement my order with a hook for now and see if the switch manufacturer will patch this switch.
-----Original Message----- From: Francis Dupont [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 9:02 PM To: Steve Teusch <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Kea-users] DHCP options order incompatibility Steve Teusch writes: > Any comments? => fix the client (or the entity which does not support any order for DHCP options) as it is clearly not RFC compliant. BTW the option 82 RAI has a SHOULD to be last, and END/255 must be the very last one possibly followed by PAD/0 simply because anything after is ignored... So there is *nothing* else in RFCs about option order and as far as I know it is at implementor choice (which is different for ISC DHCP and Kea BTW). Thanks Francis Dupont <[email protected]> PS: you can use a hook to pack options in your prefer order. _______________________________________________ Kea-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
