Hi Steve,
Just curiosity:What's your switch brand/model?
Thanks,--Joelson Vendramin
De: Steve Teusch <[email protected]>
Para: Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 5 de Julho de 2017 9:24
Assunto: Re: [Kea-users] DHCP options order incompatibility
Thank you very much for that. I will implement my order with a hook for now
and see if the switch manufacturer will patch this switch.
-----Original Message-----
From: Francis Dupont [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 9:02 PM
To: Steve Teusch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Kea-users] DHCP options order incompatibility
Steve Teusch writes:
> Any comments?
=> fix the client (or the entity which does not support any order for DHCP
options) as it is clearly not RFC compliant.
BTW the option 82 RAI has a SHOULD to be last, and END/255 must be the very
last one possibly followed by PAD/0 simply because anything after is ignored...
So there is *nothing* else in RFCs about option order and as far as I know it
is at implementor choice (which is different for ISC DHCP and Kea BTW).
Thanks
Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
PS: you can use a hook to pack options in your prefer order.
_______________________________________________
Kea-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
_______________________________________________
Kea-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
