On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 12:03 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > I don't understand why you changed the function signature for > ss_parse(). The only place it's called the return value is now ignored, > so that distinguishing between "nothing entered" and "error" is not > really done.
Its called twice: listen.c:97 (where the return value is checked) and execute_cmd.c:216 (where it isn't). -M
