On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:44:56AM -0700, Booker C. Bense wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2001, Ken Raeburn wrote:
>
> > Yes, it applies. Tom's working on a patch.
> >
>
> - Is it likely to be much different from the FreeBSD patches?
> (i.e. get rid of nfrontp and use output_data() ?)
I can't speak for the MIT folk, BUT, FreeBSD has produced patches to the
telnetd in their "port" of MIT krb5 v1.2.2, and it applies cleanly to
plain MIT krb5 v1.2.2. So, unless MIT is working on a different angle
for solving the problem, I don't see why their patch should have to be
much different from the FreeBSD patch.
> - I'm thinking it would be good to have new deamons in place
> by the weekend if possible.
And the MIT telnetd should be added to the advisory.
> - Booker C. Bense
Nico
--
.
-DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting-
-to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute-
-and copy this message.-
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.