> If you really really dislike the prefix I can look for ways to avoid it, > but I'd rather spend time on other issues right now. > > I believe a much quicker and easy solution is to have martin trim off > the prefix in java in this particular geoexpansion query.
What about the existing syntax that you have also broken? A change like this, essentially an API change, in sesat must be scheduled for 2.18. It's not that i dislike the change rather that you cannot break existing APIs like this in a stable branch (2.17). This format of the query was expected in AbstractSimpleFastSearchCommand.collectRelevantQueries(..) long before the geoexpansion work that martin has started on. On a sidenote since the index can be fast rigg can be flexible the format expected in the search command should also be. I'll try and take this into consideration for SKER2149. ~mck -- "Physics is the universe's operating system." Steven R Garman | www.semb.wever.org | www.sesat.no | www.sesam.no | _______________________________________________ Kernel-development mailing list [email protected] http://sesat.no/mailman/listinfo/kernel-development
