Hi Thomas, On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:01:01 +0200 Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| o Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | - Patch ZZA1: fix missing BITS_PER_BYTE definition in x86_64 / NUMA | introduced in CVE-2006-0557 Ok, I've moved the patch into another series, because ZZXX is really for security issues. But the final result is exactly the same. I didn't add the changelog that way, either, but something like: o Luiz Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Define BITS_PER_BYTE (patch from Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) instead. The reason is that (IMO) the 'o' line is for the person who added the commit (and that way is the responsible for it, and who should be blamed when things goes wrong). Also, would be good if we might use the same directory organization in the servers. I'm using RPM's build default organization, does it bother you? :) -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
