Hi Thomas, On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:45:53 +0200 Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Also, would be good if we might use the same directory organization in | > the servers. I'm using RPM's build default organization, does it bother | > you? :) | > | > | Well If I go by RPM it will be:to change: | | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/ | | to | | /Kernels/2006.0/RPMS/i586/ | /Kernels/2006.0/RPMS/x86_64/ | /Kernels/2006.0/SRPMS/ | | Or did you mean like you, a separate directory for every version? Like: | | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc1mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc1mdk/SRPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc2mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc2mdk/SRPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc3mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc3mdk/SRPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc4mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/x86_64/2.6.12.18.uc4mdk/SRPMS/ | | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc1mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc1mdk/SRPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc2mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc2mdk/SRPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc3mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc3mdk/SRPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc4mdk/RPMS/ | /Kernels/2006.0/i586/2.6.12.18.uc4mdk/SRPMS/ | | It will be a lot of subdirectories, since I keep every version to be | able to track regressions... Well, I don't think it's a problem. You could have a directory per kernel version for example.. But | and it wont help me making it an "urpmi"-able source... Don't worry then. I just thought that would be good to have the same directory structure. But choose the one which fits better for you. [ I could make my directory 'urpmi'-able too, but I won't keep all the versions there (too much space) ]. -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
