On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:54:18 +0000 "Vincent Panel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I read your announcement for -20.uc1mdk and it looks like it's still | not planned to port this fix to -20mdk :( why ? I wouldn't say it's not planned for -20mdk (and I didn't). Everything depends on how many important security fixes we have vs. the time required to fix it. It isn't fixed in -20uc1mdk because my queue became big due to the -19mdk release, and I don't want to fix #21345 _and_ introduce lots of kernel fixes which needs to be tested as well. | The fix is not really a patch (as far as I know), it's just a trivial | change in the SPEC file and the kernel team already agreed as far as I | know to apply it to every kernel. This would put an end to bug #21345 | and is the first step to solve #9644... Yes but IIRC Gwenolé has said it may brake config tools, and probably we'll have to change some of them. Perhaps it's not that trivial. -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
