Olivier Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Arnaud Patard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Why put that in a kernel update for a stable release? >>> Users are meant to use pmsuspend from the suspend-scripts package, >>> which already handles that. >> >> ... which is not the case. > > Oops, actually, it should be fine for 2006.0, since the cooker fixes > were never backported, sorry for the noise...
Oh ? I though too that they were backpored... > >> Not all users are using pmsuspend > > They're not using /sys/power/state either :p The correct sentence would have been "they're not using directly /sys/power/state" because, sooner or later you're using /sys/power/state to suspend the box ^^ Anyway, you're probably right :) > >> (and iirc also not all of our tools too) > > Right, some patches are still not applied... > >> So that means, there are cases where the suspend scripts were broken :( >> On some boxes, when the acpi resume of some devices is more or less >> broken (either on bios or on driver side), you may not get the power >> button event.... Depending on the device, the user may not detect that >> the device failed to resume. > > Yes, that was probably broken > > -- > Olivier Blin - Mandriva
