Em Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:11:49 -0800 Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:50 -0200, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: | > Hi, | > | > Em Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:35:36 +0000 | > "Vincent Panel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: | > | > | On 1/8/07, Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | > Le jeudi 4 janvier 2007 14:25, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino a écrit: | > | > > Em Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:43:22 -0800 | > | > > | > | > > Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: | > | > > | On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 13:47 +0000, Vincent Panel wrote: | > | > > | > >"Pascal Terjan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: | > | > > | > > "official" cooker kernels do not appear on changelog ML, and urpmi | > | > > | > > --auto-select does not select kernel. | > | > > | > > So, how do we gues that we need updating the kernel ? | > | > > | > | > | > > | > By fixing bug #9644 (I thought it was on the roadmap but I've figured | > | > > | > out there's no roadmap) : http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9644 | > | > > | | > | > > | Right. Luiz, I thought we were going to add the -latest patch in Cooker | > | > > | and 2007 kernel updates. This doesn't seem to have happened yet. Is it | > | > > | going to? | > | > > | > | > > I want to try to convince GB and Arnaud to take a look at the patches | > | > > and give some feeback. | > | > > | > | > > As said in a previous e-mail to Thomas, the best way would be to | > | > > introduce this changes in cooker's kernel first. | > | > > | > | > > BTW, this will take more time because I'm concentrated working on | > | > > the security fixes backlog. | > | > | > | > I just hope that we will not miss another release. This is waiting for | > | > approval since 1 year. | > | > | > | > On top of that as changelog no longer have newest kernel release, you have to | > | > do "urpmq --list | grep kernel" ( don't even try "urpmq -p kernel" ) to see | > | > if a newer kenrel is available :( | > | > | > | | > | Too late to be in 2007.1 ? 2008.0 ? | > | > Turns out I have a lot of higher priority work to do, cooker's | > work is low priority to me. | > | > It's in the queue though... | | Could you _please_ then at least appeal to the Cooker kernel team to | work on this? Sure, but I'm pretty sure they're aware of it already. | -latest may be low priority to you but it's high priority | to our userbase, who simply can't understand why we're incapable of | automatically updating the kernel. Yes, I see. -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
