On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:29 -0800 Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration > > in Fedora > > (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DBOBI6F3SLEAW2O5RLGZOOXQ5VKEWQIW/ > > ) I have a prototype of what a method of keeping each configuration > > file in a separate file would look like. This method takes care of > > several of my gripes of the current version (and found a few errors > > in the existing config files). The biggest question I have is if > > this will scale for how frequently Fedora adjusts configuration > > options. Some of that could possibly be solved with more scripting > > improvements. > > > > The repo is at > > https://pagure.io/fedora-kernel-labbott/branch/split_configs > > > > Thanks, > > Laura > > > > A reminder of this for those who may have missed it. I'm going to take > silence as no objection or opinion. With my s390x hat on, my wish for kernel config is to have a way to inherit the generic Fedora config, but still be able to build for example only white-listed network drivers. Right now globally enabled "PCI" enables also all drivers for all PCI-based devices (network, storage, ...), but the s390x hardware has an internal whitelist of PCI ids, so doesn't make sense to them all except the white-listed ones (seen eg. in mainline default config). Is it feasible with the new scheme? Dan _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
