I will check it with spec and kernel source.

Appreciate your help,

vichy

 

 

  _____  

From: Rajat Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: question about SCSI commands

 

Hi,

 

I think it represents the size of the command, and not size of data
transferred.

 

Thanks,

 

Rajat

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of vichy
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:31 AM
To: '??'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: question about SCSI commands

Hi:

I know there is also a number behind Linux instructions.

But I have no idea whether the number behind Linux instructions has the same
meaning as one behind SCSI.

I found these numbers from the specs and some kind friends have already told
me what it means, the bytes it transfer.

Sincerely Yours,

vichy


  _____  


From: ²ÜÒ¹ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Fw:question about SCSI commands

 

 

 Hi, I'm a green hand, too, and where did you get the information below,
from the command:

man SCSI-command

?

 

 

if it did, then it's different classification for the same function. 

number 1, maybe  means this is a write commamd

number 3, maybe means this is a write function is standard lib.

ect.

 

 

Best regards !

 

 

---------- ת·¢ÓʼþÐÅÏ¢ ----------
·¢¼þÈË£º"vichy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" 
·¢ËÍÈÕÆÚ£º2008-03-15 15:59:36
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ö÷Ì⣺ question about SCSI commands

Dear all:
I found there is number at the end of SCSI commands like below:
Command     document
WRITE(6)     SBC
WRITE(10)    SBC
WRITE(12)    SBC
Could someone tell me what the number, (6), (10) and (12) mean?
Appreciate your help,
vichy
 
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
 

 


  _____  


 <http://popme.163.com/link/003865_0303_8147.html>
Á캣5Ô¼´½«¿ªÅÌ£¡100-140©OÀ«Ë®ÊæÕ¬£¬º£ÍåÓ¡Ïó

Reply via email to