On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:36:52PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: Hi Baoquan,
> No proof is found to require that S390 architecture has to select > KEXEC. At least from my testing at below, dropping select of KEXEC won't > impact anything. It does impact the outcome of defconfigs. Namely, CONFIG_KEXEC is not set with this patch. > ===testing 1=== > CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y > CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y > === > > ===testing 2=== > CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y > CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y > === Unfortunately, I do not quite realize what these testings were and what is the difference between the two. > So drop the select of KEXEC now. I suggest dropping this patch. Once the previous two are upstream we would remove 'select KEXEC' from Kconfig together with defconfig updates. > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> > --- > arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig > index 3bec98d20283..1aec2e692dca 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig > @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ config S390 > select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_IDLE > select IOMMU_HELPER if PCI > select IOMMU_SUPPORT if PCI > - select KEXEC > select MMU_GATHER_MERGE_VMAS > select MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER > select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE > -- Thanks! _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
