On 11/23/23 at 03:13pm, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:36:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > When below kernel config items are set, compiling error are triggered. > > > > CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y > > CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y > > CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y > > CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG=y > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > drivers/base/cpu.c: In function ‘crash_hotplug_show’: > > drivers/base/cpu.c:309:40: error: implicit declaration of function > > ‘crash_hotplug_cpu_support’; did you mean ‘crash_hotplug_show’? > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > 309 | return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", crash_hotplug_cpu_support()); > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > | crash_hotplug_show > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > CONFIG_KEXEC is used to enable kexec_load interface, the > > crash_notes/crash_notes_size/crash_hotplug showing depends on > > CONFIG_KEXEC is incorrect. It should depend on KEXEC_CORE instead. > > > > Fix it now. > > If this error introduced with the prevous patch? > If so, the patches need to be swapped I guess.
From the phenomenon, yes. In fact it's the patch 1 which exposes the wrong ifdeffery. I can shift the order in v2. Thanks. > > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
