Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, it sounds like NIM 2.0 will be able to work with whatever Kerberos > libraries it is built against?
Yes. > If we can actually make it a reality, it seems like it would be very > easy to get NIM 2.0 not to depend on Kerberos 1.7. > > Of course once we start integrating the krb5 identity provider with > KIM (I think there will be calls in both directions), we will depend > on 1.7. That doesn't need to happen soon and we could presumably do a > release of NIM 2.0 before that unless NIM 2.0 takes months longer than > you say it should. Agreed. _______________________________________________ kfwdev mailing list kfwdev@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kfwdev
