On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:58:52PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: > I do see a need for being able to enable more envasive changes in the > kernel with kgdb options. For enable compiling -O0 and converting > static inline functions to simple static functions.
This is something that I worry is a case that can hide bugs you're trying to track down. Not that it couldn't live in it's own patch that doesn't make mainline... > I've never seen a case with gcc for needing to turn off -g. If > gcc ever changes code behavior with -g enabled it's a very serious > compiler bug. But I 100% agree here and is what I was trying to convey. You might indeed need to turn off -g and track down a compiler problem, but this is a very very corner case nowadays (and more likely to be hit, and fixed, before the kernel notices, imho). -- Tom Rini ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
