On 11/27/2014 12:44 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 27.11.2014 17:18, jp charras wrote: >> Le 27/11/2014 12:22, "Torsten Hüter" a écrit : >>> Hi Jean-Pierre, > >> Currently this in not the case in Pcbnew. >> This is acceptable for microwave applications, which are very specific >> (even DRC is specific in microwave applications, because traces are not >> equipot) >> > Dear Jean-Pierre & Torsten, >> But for usual applications DRC must take in account polygons. >> Currently I do not know a way to do that with a calculation time >> compatible with the on line DRC (calculating min dist between polygons >> is not as fast as calculating a min dist between basic shapes. > > I fully support the polygonal copper shapes, this can be used to > parametrically generate all RF components (TX lines, stubs, bends, > couplers, etc.) according to values provided on the schematics. > > Concerning the DRC - don't worry, it will come, sooner or later. The > geometry code that is used by the P&S can do DRC *really* fast. > > -my 5 cents. > > T. >
Should we add polygonal pad support to the road map? It seems like a good candidate. Wayne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp