On 30.06.2015 08:37, jp charras wrote: > Le 30/06/2015 01:04, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : >> On 30.06.2015 00:10, Andy Peters wrote: >>> So it’s not a bug, per se, it’s a user’s expectations issue. Chris >>> added my expectations (and I’m sure others have the same expectation) >>> to the wishlist, but I don’t think it merits much attention unless >>> the devs run out of things to do. >> >> Hi Andy, >> >> It's not only a matter of user expectations. The behavior of the legacy >> router is buggy, as the DRC takes into account only the clearance of the >> currently drawn ("head") trace. Obstacles with higher clearances are not >> detected at all. > > This is absolutely *false*. > the DRC perfectly takes in account the *clearance of each obstacle*. > > You can also easily show *each clearance* in Preferences. > Each item can be displayed with its own clearance.
I got misled by the fact that Kicad lets you override pad clearances (and so managed to route a low clearance track close to what I thought was a large clearance pad). Sorry for false claim ;) > > But for high density board, usually only the clearance to the current > track segment being edited is shown. > > Also not perfect, it is a very good help, and yes, this feature should > be considered in GAL mode. Sure, I agree. Tom _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp