On 2/17/2016 2:09 PM, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 17.02.2016 19:55, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > >> Is there any way >> to confirm that the installer on the website hasn't been compromised? > > That is a known problem with the heuristic detection: it triggers often > on JIT compilers, so it is possible that we are getting false alarms here.
I figured it was a false alarm but I want to give users some reassurance that's all that it is. > >> Perhaps an md5sum of the original installer binary. Can someone who has >> access to the packager builder please look into this for me. > > I'm extending the build script so the SHA sums of the generated files > are recorded in the build log, then we can check them easily. Please let me know when the SHA sums have been generated and where I can download them to compare against the binary I downloaded from the website. > > Simon > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
