Le 11/10/2016 à 09:03, John Devereux a écrit : > Strontium <strnty...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 11/10/16 09:27, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > [...] > >> >>> I can't think of any valid case >>> where you would want unconnected (floating) or partially connected (1 >>> connection) vias or vias that short different nets together. If you can >>> think of one, please elaborate. >> No a via floating or otherwise should never validly short different >> nets. 100% agree. > > There are of course "net ties" which can be exactly this. > > (Sorry if that is covered elsewhere, can you make a net tie component > like that? I don't know kicad well.) > >> Single ended vias and traces, yes i believe there is a reason they >> should be able to exist. > > Maybe an "access via" for manual soldering of a thermal pad under a QFN? > Usually it would go to a ground plane though. > > Thanks,
In fact, net ties (not yet really supported by Pcbnew, but there is a workaround) and complex thermal pads are using pads, not vias. In Kicad, vias are track segments, and pads are managed by footprints, therefore are managed by a schematic, from the point of view of netnames. I know some EDA tools (and users) do not make always a lot of difference between vias and pads, but this is not the case in Kicad. They are 2 fully separate entities. -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp