For now it would probably be fine to just restore the pragma for the for loop optimisation. Mac users are used to work single-threaded, all others would get back multithreading here.
> On 1. Mar 2018, at 15:58, Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch> wrote: > > On 01/03/18 15:43, Jeff Young wrote: >> The purpose is it works on Mac. >> >> But it does appear I misread the std::max( omp_get_num_procs(), 2 ) part. >> > > Thanks Jeff! > > Be aware that neither std::thread nor std::async have any concept of > thread pooling - we need to look for a suitable library or write or own. > > Cheers, > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
