On 20/03/18 14:07, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
2018-03-19 17:18 GMT-07:00 hauptmech <hauptm...@gmail.com
<mailto:hauptm...@gmail.com>>:
On 20/03/18 11:19, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
Hi hauptmech-
I disagree with your assessment of whether we should allow the
creation of broken boards. I don't think that we should ever
allow KiCad to create a board that it cannot modify itself. Doing
this is to invite confusion and bug reports.
Seth I'd rather you say that you think this puts the board in a
broken state and you don't think we should do it. I'm ok with
that. But when you summarize my assessment using your own framing
and then disagree with it, it makes it hard to work on this
objectively.
That's fair. Your phrasing is much better. I'm sorry my statement
misrepresented your assessment.
All good.
If you can update your patch to allow for fully-editable boards after
removing layers, I'll have another look at it.
I'm not sure I can. I don't have any more free time for a while. You'll
have to figure out which is worse, the bug as it is now or the patch as
it is now.
I think allowing KiCad to delete/edit a module using only the remaining
reference point is the best option if someone picks this bug up.
Best-
S
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp