> Since this is DRC, can we keep it in its current place until the DRC manager > goes in
Well, there’s DRC and there’s DR. The other options really control only what is *checked*, whereas this one controls stuff *on* the board. Granted a lot of Jon’s rules will also fit into the DR camp, but I feel a little more reticent to move this one out. Thoughts? Jeff. > On 4 Jul 2019, at 00:48, Seth Hillbrand <[email protected]> wrote: > > That was [1], right? I completely missed that fix! I can deal with not > having this option. Keepout works as well for most applications. > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1797787 > > On 2019-07-03 19:27, Jeff Young wrote: >> Bug fix. Many of our customers consider the edge cuts having width to be a >> bug. >> I suppose we could put a clearance property on a segment…. >>> On 4 Jul 2019, at 00:05, Seth Hillbrand <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I hadn't in a while. I just did. >>> That's problematic for me. Is it required for some other feature? >>> -S >>> On 2019-07-03 18:36, Jeff Young wrote: >>>> Hi Seth, >>>> Have you tried opening one of these boards? ;) >>>> (There’s code in there that sets the edge clearance to 1/2 the edge >>>> thickness if they’re consistent, and puts up a warning if they’re not >>>> consistent.) >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jeff. >>>>> On 3 Jul 2019, at 22:47, Seth Hillbrand <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Thanks Jeff! >>>>> One remaining concern is that a global edge clearance setting removes the >>>>> ability to choose the clearance based on the edge. Usually I'll have >>>>> different widths to account for whether the edge is routed, a v-score or >>>>> mouse-bite disconnect. I don't usually have multiple on one design but >>>>> every now and again, I need a close-packed board and want to have larger >>>>> clearance only where the mousebite is. >>>>> Can we keep that with DRC also? It kind of fits with the additional >>>>> rules (minimum hole to edge, minimum component to edge, etc) and the >>>>> logical evaluation system would still allow us to keep the variable >>>>> clearance feature. >>>>> Best- >>>>> Seth >>>>> On 2019-07-03 17:21, Jeff Young wrote: >>>>>> Here’s one with a (defaults…) section and no DRC settings: >>>>>> https://git.launchpad.net/~jeyjey/kicad/commit/?id=fa24a991830610dcba84f97f0e5c58be2754ef4e >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Jeff. >>>>>>> On 3 Jul 2019, at 19:46, Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> We should definitely coordinate this work. I thought Jon's drc work >>>>>>> saves the drc settings in a separate drc file for portability >>>>>>> between >>>>>>> projects. If that is the case, we should avoid adding new drc >>>>>>> settings >>>>>>> to the board file. >>>>>>> On 7/3/2019 1:46 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Jeff- >>>>>>> Can we split out the DRC things? I'm pretty sure that these are >>>>>>> included in Jon's DRC rework, so it would be nice to avoid a >>>>>>> temporary >>>>>>> file format that we supersede shortly. >>>>>>> -S >>>>>>> On 2019-07-03 06:23, Jeff Young wrote: >>>>>>> Please see >>>>>> https://git.launchpad.net/~jeyjey/kicad/commit/?id=a2c2d9f5d9b37576ec72cd0d4c64652cfddeb8df >>>>>>> for board file changes for: >>>>>>> 1) min-hole-to-hole distance >>>>>>> 2) courtyard DRC flags (require courtyards and prohibit overlapping >>>>>>> courtyards) >>>>>>> 3) default layer line widths and text dimensions >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Jeff. >>>>>>> On 2 Jul 2019, at 16:58, Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/2/2019 11:11 AM, jp charras wrote: >>>>>>> Le 02/07/2019 à 16:55, Jeff Young a écrit : >>>>>>> I was testing 5.1 and noticed that it can no longer open 6.0 files. >>>>>>> Was this accidental, or have we now diverged? >>>>>>> (I ask only because I have a bunch of fixes waiting for file format >>>>>>> changes which I could go ahead and make if we have officially >>>>>>> diverged.) >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Jeff. >>>>>>> There is at least a change: "max_error" param in "setup" section. >>>>>>> I have myself some other changes waiting in file format to support >>>>>>> zones >>>>>>> filled without outline thickness, and a support for board stackup >>>>>>> info >>>>>>> (for manufacturing purposes) >>>>>>> Since the board file format in the master branch is no longer >>>>>>> compatible >>>>>>> with the 5.1 branch, I don't see any issues with pushing file format >>>>>>> changes. I only ask that before you push commits that affect the >>>>>>> file >>>>>>> format, please post your changes so we can take a look at them so we >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> review the file format changes before we merge them. Please be sure >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> keep the file version up to date correctly as you push your >>>>>>> individual >>>>>>> changes to prevent any user issues. >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Wayne >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>>> Post to : [email protected] >>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>>> Post to : [email protected] >>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
