Hello Rouault, Once you are familiar with KIM, it is possible to develop your own applications (and then display the results in any format your require).
As an example, in the SEKT project ( http://www.sekt-project.com/ ) we've built a number of applications using KIM as the knowledge based. In one prototype, have built "agents" that are represented as KIM semantic queries; those agents are regularly activated to report to the user about new or changing web pages (found by related web crawling applications). Sandra, Can you add anything? Nick Nicholas J. Kings (Nick) Senior Researcher Next Generation Web Research, BT Group Chief Technology Office > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ilian Kitchukov > Sent: 23 January 2007 11:16 > To: Rouault frederic > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [KIM-discussion] [KIM - help "the best > architecture to consultan ontology"] > > Hi Frederik, > > > I am an other question. What is the best architecture from an > > application that consist to consult an ontology (in OWL) ? > > > > (The client part collect the keyword (it's query). And the > result of > > query, it's the together concepts and the relations of this > keyword's > > concept.) > _______________________________________________ NOTE: Please REPLY TO ALL to ensure that your reply reaches all members of this mailing list. KIM-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion_ontotext.com
