On 26/05/2011 20:26, Matthew Sacks wrote: > Shall we create a new branch for the 1.8 version?
I'm not sure it's worth it, as we haven't got a release out yet. On consideration, unless anyone objects, I'll just create a sandbox alongside trunk & upload to that. p > On May 25, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Alessandro Novarini wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I agree with everything you've written. >> Having a working starting point is great, but if keep going that way, we'll >> never touch for real the power of groovy :) >> >> But if you want to keep the "old" code and the "new" one, I guess you need >> to rename packages/classes or maybe create two custom tasks to build either >> one or the other >> >> Ale >> >> On 25 May 2011 11:01, Pid <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> Groovy 1.8 offers some improvements that may be relevant to us, in DSL >>> and command chaining. >>> >>> Implementing this would be a fairly major task as it would mean >>> rewriting most of the existing command handling - which is a bit buggy >>> at present. >>> >>> >>> Rather than commit a massive wholesale change, I propose to start adding >>> the new functionality to src/main/groovy and integrate this into the new >>> Gradle build. >>> >>> This will mean that existing code can be bug-fixed while the new >>> direction proceeds alongside. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> p >>> >>> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
