+1
On May 27, 2011, at 2:01 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 26/05/2011 20:26, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>> Shall we create a new branch for the 1.8 version?
>
> I'm not sure it's worth it, as we haven't got a release out yet.
> On consideration, unless anyone objects, I'll just create a sandbox
> alongside trunk & upload to that.
>
>
> p
>
>> On May 25, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Alessandro Novarini wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I agree with everything you've written.
>>> Having a working starting point is great, but if keep going that way, we'll
>>> never touch for real the power of groovy :)
>>>
>>> But if you want to keep the "old" code and the "new" one, I guess you need
>>> to rename packages/classes or maybe create two custom tasks to build either
>>> one or the other
>>>
>>> Ale
>>>
>>> On 25 May 2011 11:01, Pid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Groovy 1.8 offers some improvements that may be relevant to us, in DSL
>>>> and command chaining.
>>>>
>>>> Implementing this would be a fairly major task as it would mean
>>>> rewriting most of the existing command handling - which is a bit buggy
>>>> at present.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rather than commit a massive wholesale change, I propose to start adding
>>>> the new functionality to src/main/groovy and integrate this into the new
>>>> Gradle build.
>>>>
>>>> This will mean that existing code can be bug-fixed while the new
>>>> direction proceeds alongside.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> p
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
