> On Sept. 26, 2013, 10 a.m., Cristian Oneț wrote:
> > kmymoney/dialogs/transactioneditor.cpp, line 464
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112947/diff/1/?file=192725#file192725line464>
> >
> >     Are you sure that this is valid since       categoryId.clear() is 
> > called above? This only keeps the data in the widget.
> 
> Allan Anderson wrote:
>     Yes it is.  As explained above, the data in the widget is the name of the 
> interest category, but we're dealing now with a new fee category.  If we 
> clear this text, the interest category has lost its name and it needs to be 
> added again once the fee category dialog closes.
>     It definitely fixes the issue, but whether there is something deeper, I 
> don't know.
> 
> Cristian Oneț wrote:
>     See my question above, when accepting the transaction what will be the 
> value of 'categoryId' if it has been cleared and only the name was kept? Is 
> it being recomputed based on the name which was kept?
> 
> Allan Anderson wrote:
>     'categoryId' is empty on entry, in these circumstances - when adding a 
> new category.  Editing an existing one doesn't come here.
> 
> Cristian Oneț wrote:
>     OK, then it's safe.
> 
> Allan Anderson wrote:
>     Not pushing, but want to be certain whether that means OK to ship, or 
> just you're OK with that particular point?  Didn't want it to be in limbo.
>     Tidied up and retested.  All looks OK with no flicker.
>
> 
> Cristian Oneț wrote:
>     I was waiting for the updated patch to fix the other issues we've 
> discussed in this review request to give this patch the 'Ship it!'.
> 
> Allan Anderson wrote:
>     Sorry to be dim, but which issues do you mean?  If you mean the column 
> width issues, I thought your patch was all you wanted on that.  Perhaps I 
> misunderstood?

I've added a comment to signal the issues in this review request which I 
consider still open.


- Cristian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112947/#review40849
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 26, 2013, 12:03 a.m., Allan Anderson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112947/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 26, 2013, 12:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KMymoney.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 322768
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322768
> 
> 
> Repository: kmymoney
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - Interest category disappears -
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1.Open a new Dividend transaction.
> 2.Enter an interest category and amount.
> 3.Enter a new fee category.
> 4.On accepting the new category, the interest category and amount have been 
> cleared.
> One line fix in kmymoney/dialogs/transactioneditor.cpp.
> 
> - Fixes for KEditWidget visibility issues.
>  When editing an investment transaction, interest or fee edit widgets show or 
> hide incorrectly.  This is a fairly long-standing issue, and there have been 
> attempts to fix by delaying the show() or hide() instructions.  This became 
> more pronounced during work to allow column resizing, and Cristian produced a 
> fix for the root cause.  This fix is included here.
> With the above fix in place, it became necessary to revert the delayed show() 
> and hide() calls, and this has been done.
> Of course, nothing is ever as simple as that, and another couple of issues 
> emerged.  Whether or not an interest or fee amount widget is shown depends on 
> the presence or absence of the associated category's text.  It transpired 
> that if, say, an existing Reinvest transaction was edited to be, say a Buy 
> transaction,  the text from the Reinvest interest category was seen by the 
> new Buy entry and resulted in the interest-amount widget being visible when 
> none should appear.  Similarly, if a transaction with a fee set is edited to 
> be a type with no fee expected, for instance, an Add or RemoveShares, then 
> the fee-amount widget became visible when not needed.
> It was necessary to rework the slotUpdateFeeVisibility() and 
> slotUpdateInterestVisibility() functions to take account of the new 
> transaction type.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kmymoney/dialogs/investactivities.cpp 50f33ed 
>   kmymoney/dialogs/investtransactioneditor.h 3e62c2a 
>   kmymoney/dialogs/investtransactioneditor.cpp e9f87fb 
>   kmymoney/dialogs/transactioneditor.cpp 39049cf 
>   kmymoney/widgets/transactioneditorcontainer.h f77b195 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112947/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Entering and editing various transaction types to ensure only the appropriate 
> widgets became visible or hidden when required.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Allan Anderson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KMyMoney-devel mailing list
KMyMoney-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel

Reply via email to