http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
--- Comment #10 from Mirko Tietgen <mi...@abunchofthings.net> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > If it's vendor > specific, we might want to reflect that more clearly in the file name and > description. If it's general purpose, we should include notes about the file > format to make this easier to reuse. I thought about broadening the scope of the script when I signed off on the patch, checking with the table for Antolin (German reading platform with quizzes for school kids, run by a publisher). I don't think it's feasible to guess all possible fields and options that may occur in such lists, and given the non-standardized nature of these things, you never know if a format will change at some point. It is easily possible to tweak the script if you know what you need, so I'd say keeping it vendor specific and having more vendor specific scripts of this nature if needed makes sense. This patch is a good starting point for similar tasks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
