http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
--- Comment #69 from Jared Camins-Esakov <jcam...@cpbibliography.com> ---
(In reply to comment #68)
> (In reply to comment #67)
> > I think it would be best to catch that error and inform the user there is an
> > incorrectly named file. The goal is to lower the barrier to entry for
> > developers, and if a developer doesn't understand the correct naming scheme,
> > they should get useful feedback ("a file with an invalid name was provided")
> > instead of a scary error.
>
> I am still working on this report. But in advance: I think we should have
> two sets of dbrevs: the numbered ones belonging to approved, pushed patches
> and unnumbered ones, belonging to patches in dev stage. These last set
> should only be available in dev mode and can (theoretically) be executed in
> any order.
That makes sense to me. If everything has to have a numeric dbrev, even code
that might not ever work well enough to make it into Koha, we might as well
just continues to use the current updatedatabase.pl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
