http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
--- Comment #69 from Jared Camins-Esakov <jcam...@cpbibliography.com> --- (In reply to comment #68) > (In reply to comment #67) > > I think it would be best to catch that error and inform the user there is an > > incorrectly named file. The goal is to lower the barrier to entry for > > developers, and if a developer doesn't understand the correct naming scheme, > > they should get useful feedback ("a file with an invalid name was provided") > > instead of a scary error. > > I am still working on this report. But in advance: I think we should have > two sets of dbrevs: the numbered ones belonging to approved, pushed patches > and unnumbered ones, belonging to patches in dev stage. These last set > should only be available in dev mode and can (theoretically) be executed in > any order. That makes sense to me. If everything has to have a numeric dbrev, even code that might not ever work well enough to make it into Koha, we might as well just continues to use the current updatedatabase.pl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/