https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22700
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #5) > (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #4) > > Comment on attachment 87943 [details] [review] [review] > > Bug 22700: Make biblio_metadata prefetchable from Koha::Biblio > > > > Review of attachment 87943 [details] [review] [review]: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This doesn't feel entirely correct yet I'm afraid.. though I'm not close > > enough to the biblio_metadatas table to entirely understand whether we > > expect it to every be a more than one-to-one relationship with the biblio's > > table. > > It is a one-to-one relationship. Hum, really? If it was, we would have not create a new table for that. We could have different representation of the record (MARC, MARCXML, etc.), for different MARC profiles. IMO this is completely wrong, but I may have missed a previous discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/