https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22700
Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de
--- Comment #12 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #10)
> (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #4)
> > > Comment on attachment 87943 [details] [review] [review] [review]
> > > Bug 22700: Make biblio_metadata prefetchable from Koha::Biblio
> > >
> > > Review of attachment 87943 [details] [review] [review] [review]:
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > This doesn't feel entirely correct yet I'm afraid.. though I'm not close
> > > enough to the biblio_metadatas table to entirely understand whether we
> > > expect it to every be a more than one-to-one relationship with the
> > > biblio's
> > > table.
> >
> > It is a one-to-one relationship.
>
> Hum, really?
> If it was, we would have not create a new table for that.
> We could have different representation of the record (MARC, MARCXML, etc.),
> for different MARC profiles.
> IMO this is completely wrong, but I may have missed a previous discussion.
It is 1:1 right now - splitting it off biblioitems was for performance reasons,
not database design IIRC:
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17196
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
