http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7688
--- Comment #27 from Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #25) > Julian, do you think you could merge you 4 patches into one? (I can do it > when signing-off if you prefer). It would help at this stage, will help for > QA. IMHO, follow-up patches are best suited later, when the main patch has > already been pushed, and that some minor improvements, tweaking are done. Just for the record = having follow-ups is useful when someone has tested, made some comments, and the patcher want to show the differences between previous patch, and updated patch. In this case, follow-up is OK an even better, and maybe squashed after signoff/QA process. Note that for a 2 or 3 lines patch, it can be squashed immediately, because changing just a line is easy to spot. My comment apply to larger patches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
