https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29386
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Nugged <nug...@gmail.com> --- What things hold us from allowing this to be LONGTEXT? Will fields occupy much more space on disk as I thought and only? I had only things one from "cons" and here people already thought the same: "The only difference is the length field in the row data. Using MEDIUMTEXT instead of LONGTEXT saves 1 byte per record. If you have 100 million records, that saves 100 MB." https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58225898/mysql-is-there-a-lack-of-performance-by-using-longtext-instead-of-mediumtext no more cons from having LONGTEXT? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
