https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29386
--- Comment #8 from Martin Renvoize <martin.renvo...@ptfs-europe.com> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #7) > I think I'd go for LONGTEXT straight away personally.. in the grand scheme, > disk space isn't usually the limiting factor these days.. Lets justify that slightly.. my thoughts are there aren't going to be lots of reports against this data and the queries we're using on this table are specific enough and not on that particular field such that it shouldn't have any other knock on performance issues... where it would count is if we did another utf8-mb4 type upgrade down the line.. that would be a slow process for such a large field if there were lots of rows in it.. but that's all reasonably easy to resolve. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
