https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31161
--- Comment #43 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens (kidclamp) from comment #42) > If you don't get to upload your patches I would still be interested just to > hear how you approached it. I did consider here returning the hidden records > as 'deleted'- it would have been even less code, but that felt like we still > told them something was there - rather than full suppress the existence. I'll be posting a patch soon :) And yeah I was thinking about that as well. Although someone enumerating bibs via the web UI would notice gaps in biblionumbers returning records as well. With my patch, a discerning consumer would also notice that most deleted records are at the start of the feed and that it was a bit weird for there to be deleted records elsewhere in the feed. I've been running my code in prod for a while and my libraries are happy, but they're just concerned about display/visibility of the records. Not the supreme/total hiding of the existence of that record at all. (But I know there are libraries out there that do care about that.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
