https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31161
--- Comment #52 from Jonathan Field <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #48) > Tempted to move this to "In discussion" but then I know that's where bugs go > to die... > > Jonathan: do you have an opinion which you'd like better? > > Once Nick fixes the ListIdentifiers and tidy, I think I'd be fine with > either approach. > > I do think mine requires fewer interventions. For instance, I think a lot of > libraries would change OpacHiddenItems and not think to redo their OAI-PMH > harvests across all consumers. It's a lot of friction. > > If we did go that route, I think we'd need to update the description for > OpacHiddenItems to add a warning that they'll need to advise their OAI-PMH > consumers to re-harvest all records each time it's changed. I think I'm also fine with either approach. I agree with Nick that, if you were to change opachiddenitems, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect to do a complete re-harvest. Certainly if EDS was going to be populated from a MARC dump, that's the approach you would take. Having said that, I think marking them as deleted is marginally better in that it's very clear that they are not wanted and it would be easy to spot them and also the consumer could easily act on that too. Happy to test and sign-off either approach. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
