https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23415

--- Comment #220 from Lucas Gass (lukeg) <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Emmi Takkinen from comment #219)
> (In reply to Lucas Gass (lukeg) from comment #217)
> > I have concerns about the oweing -> owing patch. This is going to break a
> > lot of auto renewal notices for us.
> 
> I tried dropping the patch, but there are still a lot code using owing
> instead of oweing. Those should probably be changed too. So I was wondering,
> is it okay if I create a separate patch where all owings are changed to
> oweing rather than dropping the patch and then handling rest of the patches
> one by one?

For the change of oweing -> owing we really need a separate bug that would also
include DB updates of the default auto renewal notices and the issues table.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to