https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23415
--- Comment #221 from Emmi Takkinen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Lucas Gass (lukeg) from comment #220) > (In reply to Emmi Takkinen from comment #219) > > (In reply to Lucas Gass (lukeg) from comment #217) > > > I have concerns about the oweing -> owing patch. This is going to break a > > > lot of auto renewal notices for us. > > > > I tried dropping the patch, but there are still a lot code using owing > > instead of oweing. Those should probably be changed too. So I was wondering, > > is it okay if I create a separate patch where all owings are changed to > > oweing rather than dropping the patch and then handling rest of the patches > > one by one? > > For the change of oweing -> owing we really need a separate bug that would > also include DB updates of the default auto renewal notices and the issues > table. Yes, I agree with that. But what I meant with my comment was that should I change all the owing terms back to oweing in a new patch in this bug or should I drop the "Bug 23415: (QA follow-up) Fix spelling: oweing -> owing" patch and then change all the remaining owing words to oweing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
