Paul, et. al., Sorry about the second e-mail ten seconds after the first.
(I don't want to count bug 6858 in this list, because, for me, it has > been tested by a dis-interested -well, in fact, calling the library > "dis-interested" is maybe not the best term, but nevermind ;-) ) > I don't see how the library that commissioned the development could be disinterested. I don't want to break the rule. I just request that 3 identified ppl > from BibLibre can sign-off in the name of the customer (I like the Proxy > term). > In case this wasn't clear, I have absolutely no objection to this, provided the customer sticks a note on the bug so the history is clear. Actually, if I have time, I'd like to extend your sandbox code to allow libraries to sign off directly from the sandbox. I'd also like to add features to allow the sandbox system to handle testing indexing. Better to have your project managers test other patches than spend time inserting "Signed-off-by" lines for libraries that are using the sandbox but don't understand git. :) Regards, Jared -- Jared Camins-Esakov Bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 (e-mail) [email protected] (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
