Doug, I would concur that 001 and 003 need to be taken together to have any > chance of a unique identifier. Our library has our own unique 003 > (UkLoVW). For indexing, I suspect a better key to hand to zebra would be > the system control number (035 $a). Are these kept unique by koha? >
We already have a unique identifier, the biblionumber. It's stored in 999$c. The bug in this case is that the DOM indexing uses the contents in 001 if you have it populated. > While I do believe this is a problem, I am not sure how this would the > cause of our ModAuthority failures however, unless I am missing something. > See the other mail thread for details (3.8.4 Error message when editing > authorities). Its possible these issues are related but I am not sure. > The ZOOM error you reported might have something to do with this, but I just don't know. I don't think I've ever seen problems with ZOOM element (as opposed to attribute) before. Regards, Jared -- Jared Camins-Esakov Bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 (e-mail) jcam...@cpbibliography.com (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/ _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha