Vinod, This already exists and is auto-generated for each release. For 17.05, https://koha-community.org/koha-17-05-released But, as said previously by others, 1 != 1 and there are much more than just writing patches in a community daily tasks.
Regards, Jonathan On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 at 07:15 vinod mishra <mishrav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we can make a parameter like the company who have submitted at > least five patch/new code for major active release oldoldstable, oldstable > and stable will be only listed. For example if a company has five > code/patch in 16.5 than he may be listed continuously up-to 17.5 once 17.11 > will release and there is no contribution in 16.11 than they may be delist. > > Above is only one parameter but someone have to monitor this continuously > to update the list, however range of version can be increased, by doing so > they will be encouraged to contribute continuously if they do not want to > die from list. > > > With Regards, > > Vinod Kumar Mishra, > Assistant Librarian, > Biju Patnaik Central Library (BPCL), > NIT Rourkela, > Sundergadh-769008, > Odisha, > India. > Mob:91+9439420860 > Website: http://mishravk.com/ > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7874 > > *"Spiritual relationship is far more precious than physical. Physical > relationship divorced from spiritual is body without soul" -- Mahatma > Gandhi* > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Mark Tompsett <mtomp...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Nathan A. Curulla suggested: > > > Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” > or > > > something like that. > > > > While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community > > participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. > > We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no > > official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use > it > > that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even > > though > > the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a > > Koha > > support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to > > delete > > the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what > we > > put on the page(s). > > > > > > Owen Leonard wrote: > > > It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected. > > > > Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some > > other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And > > cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the > > list > > already. > > > > GPML, > > Mark Tompsett > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > > Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz > > https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz > https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha