On Wednesday 11 October 2006 9:29, Michel Hermier wrote: > For me the bench is wrong, since the method signatures are not comparable. > And I find it normal that it's more harder to parse the second one > since there are more needed spaces and characters. > Do you have results with the same signatures, but one with nominal, > and the other with some extra spaces ?
from the documentation on QMetaObject::normalizedSignature:
Normalizes the signature of the given \a method.
Qt uses normalized signatures to decide whether two given signals
and slots are compatible. Normalization reduces whitespace to a
minimum, moves 'const' to the front where appropriate, removes
'const' from value types and replaces const references with
values.
so "sig( const QString& )" becomes "sig(QString)"
--
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)
pgpEvGMVUJB5w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
