On Wed, April 11, 2007 3:04 pm, Gus Wirth wrote: > Where did you hear that? Are you referring to the abysmal attempts by > the FSF to provide a free alternative to Flash? The stuff that doesn't > work and probably will never work because it would violate Adobe's > trademark/copywrite/patent?
That's what I thought about xpdf but it seems to be kicking without getting litigated to death. > Even Adobe's own player still has some problems in Linux, like weird > loops, ignoring user commands to stop playing (that might be a feature), > and freeze-ups. No argument. Been there. That just means FSF's version must be bug-for-bug compatible! :) Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
