James G. Sack (jim) wrote: > > Are you not mixing syntax validation (well-formedness) with the more > specific (ie, DTD) document validation (that blq _may_ have meant)? > > Not that DTD validation is always needed/desired, but when it is, the > choice of xml would seem to be a no-brainer.
That breaks the internet. % lynx -dump http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1122.txt | grep -B1 'nd"$' "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" -john -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
